Paper detail

Effect of radiation drag on the line-force-driven winds

Ultra-fast outflows (UFOs) with mildly relativistic velocities are measured using the X-ray spectra of radio-quiet and -loud active galactic nuclei (AGNs). In general, UFOs are believed to be generated from the accretion disk around a black hole (BH). A line-force driving model is suggested to be the mechanism to drive UFOs from the accretion disk. In this paper, we use the non-hydrodynamic approach to examine the influences of radiation-drag effects on the line-force-driven winds generated from the accretion disk. We find that the radiation-drag effects can significantly weaken the line-force-driven winds. Compared with the case without the radiation-drag effects, when the radiation-drag effects are considered, the maximum speed of winds is reduced by $\sim$60\%--70\%, the mass outflow rate is reduced by $\sim$50\%--80\%, and the kinetic power is reduced by about an order of magnitude. The radiation-drag effects narrow the area where the winds are generated.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.