Paper detail

Effect of $R$-site substitution and the pressure on stability of $R$Fe$_{12}$: A first-principles study

We theoretically study the structural stability of $R$Fe$_{12}$ with the ThMn$_{12}$ structure ($R$: rare-earth elements, La, Pr, Nd, Sm, Gd, Dy, Ho, Er, Tm, Lu, Y, or Sc, or group-IV elements, Zr or Hf) based on density functional theory. The formation energy has a strong correlation with the atomic radius of $R$. The formation energy relative to simple substances decreases as the atomic radius decreases, except for $R=$ Sc and Hf, while that relative to $R_{2}$Fe$_{17}$ and bcc Fe has a minimum for $R=$ Dy. The present results are consistent with recent experimental reports in which the partial substitution of Zr at $R$ sites stabilizes $R$Fe$_{12}$-type compounds with $R=$ Nd or Sm. Our results also suggest that the partial substitution of Y, Dy, Ho, Er, or Tm for Nd or Sm is a possible way to enhance the stability of the ThMn$_{12}$ structure. Under hydrostatic pressure, the formation enthalpy decreases up to $\approx$ 6 GPa and then starts to increase at higher pressures.

preprint2018arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.