Paper detail

Effect of Precursors and Radiation on Soot Formation in Turbulent Diffusion Flame

Soot formation in Delft flame III, a pilot stabilized turbulent diffusion flame burning natural gas/air, is investigated using ANSYS FLUENT by considering two different approaches for soot inception. In the first approach soot inception is based on the formation rate of acetylene, while the second approach considers the formation rate of two and three-ringed aromatics to describe the soot inception [1]. Transport equations are solved for soot mass fraction and radical nuclei concentration to describe inception, coagulation, surface growth, and oxidation processes. The turbulent-chemistry interactions and soot precursors are described by the steady laminar flamelet model (SLFM). Two chemical mechanisms GRI 3.0 [2] and POLIMI [3] are used to represent the effect of species concentration on soot formation. The radiative properties of the medium are included based on the non-gray modeling approach by considering four factious gases; the weighted sum of gray gas (WSGGM) approach is used to model the absorption coefficient. The effect of soot on radiative transfer is modeled in terms of effective absorption coefficient of the medium. A beta probability density function (\b{eta}-PDF) in terms of normalized temperature is used to describe the effect of turbulence on soot formation. The results clearly elucidate the strong effect of radiation and species concentration on soot volume fraction predictions. Due to increase in radiative heat loss with soot, flame temperature decreases slightly. The inclusion of ethylene has less synergic effect than that of both benzene and ethylene. Both cases have less impact on the nucleation of soot. The increase in soot volume fraction with soot-turbulence interaction is in consistence with the DNS predictions.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.