Paper detail

Effect of population size in a Prey-Predator model

We consider a stochastic version of the basic predator-prey differential equation model. The model, which contains a parameter ωwhich represents the number of individuals for one unit of prey -- If x denotes the quantity of prey in the differential equation model x = 1 means that there are ωindividuals in the discontinuous one -- is derived from the classical birth and death process. It is shown by the mean of simulations and explained by a mathematical analysis based on results in singular perturbation theory (the so called theory of Canards) that qualitative properties of the model like persistence or extinction are dramatically sensitive to ω. For instance, in our example, if ω= 107 we have extinction and if ω= 108 we have persistence. This means that we must be very cautious when we use continuous variables in place of jump processes in dynamic population modeling even when we use stochastic differential equations in place of deterministic ones.

preprint2011arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.