Paper detail

Effect of nonmagnetic impurities on $s_\pm$ superconductivity in the presence of incipient bands

Several Fe chalcogenide superconductors without hole pockets at the Fermi level display high temperature superconductivity, in apparent contradiction to naive spin fluctuation pairing arguments. Recently, scanning tunneling microscopy measurements have measured the influence of impurities on some of these materials, and claimed that non-magnetic impurities do not create in-gap states, leading to the conclusion that the gap must be $s_{++}$, i.e. conventional $s$ wave with no gap sign change. Here we critique this argument, and give various ways sign-changing gaps can be consistent with the absence of such bound states. In particular, we calculate the bound states for an $s_\pm$ system with a hole pocket below the Fermi level, and show that the nonmagnetic impurity bound state energy generically tracks the gap edge $E_{min}$ in the system, thereby rendering it unobservable. A failure to observe a bound state in the case of a nonmagnetic impurity can therefore not be used as an argument to exclude sign-changing pairing states.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.