Effect of model-dependent covariance matrix for studying Baryon Acoustic Oscillations

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Abstract

Large-scale structures in the Universe are a powerful tool to test cosmological models and constrain cosmological parameters. A particular feature of interest comes from Baryon Acoustic Oscillations (BAOs), which are sound waves traveling in the hot plasma of the early Universe that stopped at the recombination time. This feature can be observed as a localized bump in the correlation function at the scale of the sound horizon rsr_s. As such, it provides a standard ruler and a lot of constraining power in the correlation function analysis of galaxy surveys. Moreover the detection of BAOs at the expected scale gives a strong support to cosmological models. Both of these studies (BAO detection and parameter constraints) rely on a statistical modeling of the measured correlation function ξ^\hatξ. Usually ξ^\hatξ is assumed to be gaussian, with a mean ξθξ_θ depending on the cosmological model and a covariance matrix CC generally approximated as a constant (i.e. independent of the model). In this article we study whether a realistic model-dependent CθC_θ changes the results of cosmological parameter constraints compared to the approximation of a constant covariance matrix CC. For this purpose, we use a new procedure to generate lognormal realizations of the Luminous Red Galaxies sample of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey Data Release 7 to obtain a model-dependent CθC_θ in a reasonable time. The approximation of CθC_θ as a constant creates small changes in the cosmological parameter constraints on our sample. We quantify this modeling error using a lot of simulations and find that it only has a marginal influence on cosmological parameter constraints for current and next-generation galaxy surveys. It can be approximately taken into account by extending the 1σ1σ intervals by a factor ≈1.3\approx 1.3.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.