Paper detail

Effect of grain size distribution and size-dependent grain heating on molecular abundances in starless and pre-stellar cores

We present a new gas-grain chemical model to constrain the effect of grain size distribution on molecular abundances in starless and pre-stellar cores. We introduce grain-size dependence simultaneously for cosmic-ray (CR)-induced desorption efficiency and for grain equilibrium temperatures. We keep explicit track of ice abundances on a set of grain populations. We find that the size-dependent CR desorption efficiency affects ice abundances in a highly non-trivial way that depends on the molecule. Species that originate in the gas phase follow a simple pattern where the ice abundance is highest on the smallest grains (the most abundant in the distribution). Some molecules, such as HCN, are instead concentrated on large grains throughout the time evolution, while others (like $\rm N_2$) are initially concentrated on large grains, but at late times on small grains, due to grain-size-dependent competition between desorption and hydrogenation. Most of the water ice is on small grains at high medium density ($n({\rm H_2}) \gtrsim 10^6 \, \rm cm^{-3}$), where the water ice fraction, with respect to total water ice reservoir, can be as low as $\sim 10^{-3}$ on large (> 0.1 $μ$m) grains. Allowing the grain equilibrium temperature to vary with grain size induces strong variations in relative ice abundances in low-density conditions where the interstellar radiation field and in particular its ultraviolet component are not attenuated. Our study implies consequences not only for the initial formation of ices preceding the starless core stage, but also for the relative ice abundances on the grain populations going into the protostellar stage. In particular, if the smallest grains can lose their mantles due to grain-grain collisions as the core is collapsing, the ice composition in the beginning of the protostellar stage could be very different to that in the pre-collapse phase.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.