Paper detail

Effect of dust on Kelvin-Helmholtz instabilities

Dust is present in a large variety of astrophysical fluids, from tori around supermassive black holes to molecular clouds, protoplanetary discs, and cometary outflows. In many such fluids, shearing flows are present, leading to the formation of Kelvin-Helmholtz instabilities (KHI) and changing the properties and structures of the fluid through processes such as mixing and clumping of dust. We investigate how dust changes the growth rates of the KHI in 2D and 3D and how the it redistributes and clumps dust. We investigate if similarities can be found between the structures in 3D KHI and those seen in observations of molecular clouds. We do this by performing numerical hydrodynamical dust+gas simulations with in addition to gas a number of dust fluids. Each dust fluid represents a portion of the particle size-distribution. We study how dust-to-gas mass density ratios between 0.01 and 1 alter the growth rate in the linear phase of the KHI. We do this for a wide range of perturbation wavelengths, and compare these values to the analytical gas-only growth rates. As the formation of high-density dust structures is of interest in many astrophysical environments, we scale our simulations with physical quantities similar to values in molecular clouds. Large differences in dynamics are seen for different grain sizes. We demonstrate that high dust-to-gas ratios significantly reduce the growth rate of the KHI, especially for short wavelengths. We compare the dynamics in 2D and 3D simulations, where the latter demonstrates additional full 3D instabilities during the non-linear phase, leading to increased dust densities. We compare the structures formed by the KHI in 3D simulations with those in molecular clouds and see how the column density distribution of the simulation shares similarities with log-normal distributions with power-law tails sometimes seen in observations of molecular clouds.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.