Paper detail

Effect of cosmic ray/X-ray ionization on supermassive black hole formation

We study effects of external ionization by cosmic rays (CRs) and X-rays on the thermal evolution of primordial clouds under strong far-ultraviolet (FUV) radiation. A strong FUV radiation dissociates H2 and quenches its cooling. Even in such an environment, a massive cloud with Tvir>10^4 K can contract isothermally at 8000 K by Lyman alpha cooling. This cloud collapses monolithically without fragmentation, and a supermassive star (>10^5 Msun) is believed to form at the center, which eventually evolves to a supermassive black hole (SMBH). However, candidates of FUV sources, including star-forming galaxies, are probably sources of strong CRs and X-rays, as well. We find that the external ionization promotes H2 production and elevates the threshold FUV intensity Jcr needed for the SMBH formation for CR energy density U_CR>10^-14 erg/cm^3 or X-ray intensity J_X>10^-24 erg/s/cm^2/sr/Hz at 1 keV. The critical FUV flux increases in proportion to U_CR^{1/2} (J_X^{1/2}) in the high CR (X-ray, respectively) limit. With the same value of FUV intensity at the Lyman limit (13.6 eV), the H^- photodissociation rate, with threshold of 0.755 eV, increases and the H2 molecules decrease with decreasing effective temperature of the FUV sources T*. The lower value of T* thus results in the lower critical FUV flux at 13.6 eV. Using an empirical relation between intensities of FUV and CR/X-ray from nearby star-forming galaxies, we find that external ionization effect remarkably enhances the critical FUV flux for sources with T* as high as 10^5 K and composed of stars with <100 Msun to a level that is not realized in any halo. This indicates that, to induce SMBH formation, the FUV sources must be either Pop II/I galaxies with low brightness temperature, Pop III galaxies with a very top-heavy IMF, or Pop III galaxies too young to harbor sources of CR/X-ray, e.g., supernova remnants or high-mass X-ray binaries.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.