Paper detail

Effect of Binary Fraction on Horizontal Branch Morphology under Tidally Enhanced Stellar Wind

Tidally enhanced stellar wind may affect horizontal branch (HB) morphology in globular clusters (GCs) by enhancing the mass loss of primary star during binary evolution. Lei et al. (2013a, 2013b) studied the effect of this kind of wind on HB morphology in details, and their results indicated that binary is a possible secondparameter (2P) candidate in GCs. Binary fraction is an very important fact in the tidally-enhanced-stellar-wind model. In this paper, we studied the effect of binary fraction on HB morphology by removing the effects of metallicity and age. Five different binary fractions (i.e., 10%, 15%, 20%, 30% and 50%) are adopted in our model calculations. The synthetic HB morphologies with different binary fractions are obtained at different metallicities and ages. We found that, due to the great influence of metallicity and age, the effect of binary fraction on HB morphology may be masked by these two parameters. However, when the effects of metallicity and age are removed, the tendency that HB morphologies become bluer with increasing of binary fractions is clearly presented. Furthermore, we compared our results with the observation by Milone et al. (2012). Our results are consistent well with the observation at metalrich and metal-poor GCs. For the GCs with intermediate metallicity, when the effect of age on HB morphology is removed, a weak tendency that HB morphologies become bluer with increasing of binary fractions is presented in all regions of GCs, which is consistent with our results obtained in this metallicity range.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.