Paper detail

Effect of annealing on the specific heat of optimally doped Ba(Fe$_{0.92}$Co$_{0.08}$)$_{2}$As$_{2}$

We report the temperature dependence of the low-temperature specific heat down to 400 mK of the electron-doped Ba(Fe$_{0.92}$Co$_{0.08}$)$_{2}$As$_{2}$ superconductors. We have measured two samples extracted from the same batch: first sample has been measured just after preparation with no additional heat treatment. The sample shows $T_{c}$=20 K, residual specific heat $γ_{0}$=3.6 mJ/mol K$^{2}$ and a Schottky-like contribution at low temperatures. A second sample has been annealed at 800 $^{o}C$ for two weeks and shows $T_{c}$ = 25 K and $γ_{0}$=1.4 mJ/mol~K$^{2}$. By subtracting the lattice specific heat, from pure BaFe$_{2}$As$_{2}$, the temperature dependence of the electronic specific heat has been obtained and studied. For both samples the temperature dependence of $C_{el}(T)$ clearly indicate the presence of low-energy excitations in the system. Their specific heat data cannot be described by single clean s- or d-wave models and the data requires an anisotropic gap scenario which may or may not have nodes

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access9 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.