Paper detail

Effect of a variable cosmological constant on black hole quasinormal modes

Many different cosmological models have been proposed to address the cosmological constant problem and the coincidence problem. We compare here four different models that can be used to describe an effective (time-dependent) cosmological constant $Λ(z)$. A numerical analysis of the $Λ(z)$ evolution obtained for each model shows that it can be used for distinguishing between all four models. We calculate next the $ω(Λ)$ frequencies for quasinormal modes of gravitational perturbations of Schwarzschild-de Sitter black holes at different redshifts. Considering that the variation of $Λ$ happens on cosmological timescales, the combined $ω(Λ(z))$ could be used in principle to track the evolution of the cosmological constant. We quantify the resulting minute frequency shift in the quasinormal mode frequencies and show that the relative frequency shift grows as $M^2$. However, even in a most optimistic scenario with an extremely high mass supermassive black hole there is no prospect for the detection of this effect.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.