Paper detail

Edge Isoperimetric Inequalities for Powers of the Hypercube

For positive integers $n$ and $r$, we let $Q_n^r$ denote the $r$th power of the $n$-dimensional discrete hypercube graph, i.e., the graph with vertex-set $\{0,1\}^n$, where two 0-1 vectors are joined if they are Hamming distance at most $r$ apart. We study edge isoperimetric inequalities for this graph. Harper, Bernstein, Lindsey and Hart proved a best-possible edge isoperimetric inequality for this graph in the case $r=1$. For each $r \geq 2$, we obtain an edge isoperimetric inequality for $Q_n^r$; our inequality is tight up to a constant factor depending only upon $r$. Our techniques also yield an edge isoperimetric inequality for the `Kleitman-West graph' (the graph whose vertices are all the $k$-element subsets of $\{1,2,\ldots,n\}$, where two $k$-element sets have an edge between them if they have symmetric difference of size two); this inequality is sharp up to a factor of $2+o(1)$ for sets of size ${n -s \choose k-s}$, where $k=o(n)$ and $s \in \mathbb{N}$.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.