Paper detail

Eddy Covariance: A Scientometric Review (1981-2018)

The history of eddy covariance (EC) measuring system could be dated back to 100 years ago, but it was not until the recent decades that EC gains popularity and being widely used in global change ecological studies, with explosion of related work published in papers from various journals. Investigating 8297 literature related with EC from 1981 to 2018, we make a comprehensive and critical review of scientific development of EC from a scientometric perspective. First, the paper outlines general bibliometric statistics, including publication number, country contribution, productive institutions, active authors, journal distribution, highly cited articles and fund support, to provide an informative picture of EC studies. Second, research trends are revealed by network visualization and modeling based on keyword analysis, from where we could discover the knowledge structure of EC and detect the research focus and hotspots transitions at different periods. Third, collaboration in EC research community has been explored. FLUXNET is the largest global network uniting EC researchers, here we have quantified and evaluated its performance by using bibliometric indicators of cooperation and citation. Specific discussions have been given to the historical development of EC, including technical maturation and application promotion. Considering the current barrier for collaboration, the review closes by analyzing the reasons hindering data sharing and makes a prospect of new models for data-intensive collaboration in the future.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.