Paper detail

ECME Thresholding Methods for Sparse Signal Reconstruction

We propose a probabilistic framework for interpreting and developing hard thresholding sparse signal reconstruction methods and present several new algorithms based on this framework. The measurements follow an underdetermined linear model, where the regression-coefficient vector is the sum of an unknown deterministic sparse signal component and a zero-mean white Gaussian component with an unknown variance. We first derive an expectation-conditional maximization either (ECME) iteration that guarantees convergence to a local maximum of the likelihood function of the unknown parameters for a given signal sparsity level. To analyze the reconstruction accuracy, we introduce the minimum sparse subspace quotient (SSQ), a more flexible measure of the sampling operator than the well-established restricted isometry property (RIP). We prove that, if the minimum SSQ is sufficiently large, ECME achieves perfect or near-optimal recovery of sparse or approximately sparse signals, respectively. We also propose a double overrelaxation (DORE) thresholding scheme for accelerating the ECME iteration. If the signal sparsity level is unknown, we introduce an unconstrained sparsity selection (USS) criterion for its selection and show that, under certain conditions, applying this criterion is equivalent to finding the sparsest solution of the underlying underdetermined linear system. Finally, we present our automatic double overrelaxation (ADORE) thresholding method that utilizes the USS criterion to select the signal sparsity level. We apply the proposed schemes to reconstruct sparse and approximately sparse signals from tomographic projections and compressive samples.

preprint2010arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.