Paper detail

Eclipse timing variations in post-common envelope binaries: Are they a reliable indicator of circumbinary companions?

Post-common envelope binary systems evolve when matter is transferred from the primary star at a rate that cannot be accommodated by its secondary companion. A common envelope forms which is subsequently ejected resulting in a system with a binary period frequently between 2 and 3 hours. Where circumbinary companions are predicted, it remains unclear whether they form before or after the common envelope ejection. From observations of eclipse time variations (ETVs), exoplanet databases e.g. NASA Exoplanet Archive, list typically a dozen systems with confirmed circumbinary planets. Here we examine seven of these systems, discuss other possible causes and consider whether, for these dynamic systems, the ETV methodology is a reliable indicator of planetary companions. The systems selected were those where we could determine precise eclipse timings, free from significant extraneous effects such as pulsations, and present 163 new times of minima permitting us to test existing models. Over thirty circumbinary models have been proposed for these seven systems and note all, other than the latest model for NY Vir which remains to be fully tested, fail within a year to accurately predict eclipse times. In examining alternative mechanisms we find that magnetic effects could contribute significantly in two of the seven systems studied. We conclude that the structure of these dynamic systems, with the extreme temperature differences and small binary separations, are not fully understood and that many factors may contribute to the observed ETVs.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.