Paper detail

Eccentric Mergers of Intermediate-Mass Black Holes from Evection Resonances in AGN Disks

We apply the theory of nonlinear resonance capture to the problem of a black hole binary (BHB) orbiting a supermassive black hole (SMBH) while embedded in the accretion disk of an active galactic nucleus (AGN). If successful, resonance capture can trigger dramatic growth in the BHB eccentricity, with important consequences for the BHB merger timescale, as well as for the gravitational wave (GW) signature of such an eccentric merger. This resonance capture may occur when the orbital period around the SMBH (the "outer binary") and the apsidal precession of the BHB (the "inner binary") are in a 1:1 commensurability. This effect is analogous to the phenomenon of lunar evection resonance in the early Sun-Earth-Moon system, with the distinction that in the present case, the BHB apsidal precession is due to general relativity, rather than rotationally-induced distortion. In contrast to the case of lunar evection, however, the inner binary undergoes orbital decay driven by GW emission, rather than orbital expansion driven by tidal dissipation. This distinction fundamentally alters the three-body dynamics, forbidding resonance capture, and limiting eccentricity growth. However, if the BHB migrates through of a gaseous AGN disk, the change in the outer binary can counterbalance the suppressing effect of BHB decay, permitting evection resonance capture and the production of eccentric BHB mergers. We compute the likelihood of resonance capture assuming an agnostic distribution of parameters for the three bodies involved and for the properties of the AGN disk. We find that intermediate-mass ratio BHBs (involving an intermediate-mass black hole and a stellar-mass black hole) are the most likely to be captured into evection resonance and thus undergo an eccentric merger. We also compute the GW signature of these mergers, showing that they can enter the LISA band while eccentric.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.