Paper detail

Earth Regeneration of Solar Neutrinos at SNO and Super-Kamiokande

We analyze the 1258-day Super-Kamiokande day and night solar neutrino energy spectra with various $χ^2$ definitions. The best-fit lies in the LMA region at $(Δm^2, tan^2 θ)=(5.01\times 10^{-5} eV^2, 0.60)$, independently of whether systematic errors are included in the $χ^2$-definition. We compare the exclusion and allowed regions from the different definitions and choose the most suitable definition to predict the regions from SNO at the end of three years of data accumulation. We first work under the assumption that Super-Kamiokande sees a flux-suppressed flat energy spectrum. Then, we consider the possibility of each one of the three MSW regions being the solution to the solar neutrino problem. We find that the exclusion and allowed regions for the flat spectrum hypothesis and the LMA and LOW solutions are alike. In three years, we expect SNO to find very similar regions to that obtained by Super-Kamiokande. We evaluate whether the zenith angle distribution at SNO with optimum binning will add anything to the analysis of the day and night spectra; for comparison, we show the results of our analysis of the 1258-day zenith angle distribution from Super-Kamiokande, for which the best-fit parameters are $(Δm^2, tan^2 θ)=(5.01\times 10^{-5} eV^2, 0.56)$.

preprint2001arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors4 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.