Paper detail

Early-universe constraints on a Primordial Scaling Field

In the past years 'quintessence' models have been considered which can produce the accelerated expansion in the universe suggested by recent astronomical observations. One of the key differences between quintessence and a cosmological constant is that the energy density in quintessence, $Ω_ϕ$, could be a significant fraction of the overall energy even in the early universe, while the cosmological constant will be dynamically relevant only at late times. We use standard Big Bang Nucleosynthesis and the observed abundances of primordial nuclides to put constraints on $Ω_ϕ$ at temperatures near $T \sim 1MeV$. We point out that current experimental data does not support the presence of such a field, providing the strong constraint $Ω_ϕ(MeV) < 0.045$ at $2σ$ C.L. and strengthening previous results. We also consider the effect a scaling field has on CMB anisotropies using the recent data from Boomerang and DASI, providing the CMB constraint $Ω_ϕ\le 0.39$ at $2σ$ during the radiation dominated epoch.

preprint2001arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.