Paper detail

Early planet formation in embedded protostellar disks: Setting the stage for the first generation of planetesimals

(Abridged) Recent surveys of young star formation regions have shown that the average Class II object does not have enough dust mass to make the cores of giant planets. Younger Class 0/I objects have enough dust in their embedded disk, which begs the questions: can the first steps of planet formation occur in these younger systems? The first step is building the first planetesimals, generally believed to be the product of the streaming instability. Hence the question can be restated: are the physical conditions of embedded disks conducive to the growth of the streaming instability? Here we model the collapse of a `dusty' proto-stellar cloud to show that if there is sufficient drift between the falling gas and dust, regions of the embedded disk can become sufficiently enhanced in dust to drive the streaming instability. We include four models, three with different dust grain sizes and one with a different initial cloud angular momentum to test a variety of collapse trajectories. We find a `sweet spot' for planetesimal formation for grain sizes of a few 10s of micron since they fall sufficiently fast relative to the gas to build a high dust-to-gas ratio along the disk midplane, but have slow enough radial drift speeds in the embedded disk to maintain the high dust-to-gas ratio. Unlike the gas, which is held in hydrostatic equilibrium for a time due to gas pressure, the dust can begin collapsing from all radii at a much earlier time. The streaming instability can produce at least between 7-35 M$_\oplus$ of planetesimals in the Class 0/I phase of our smooth embedded disks, depending on the size of the falling dust grains. This first generation of planetesimals could represent the first step in planet formation, and occurs earlier in the lifetime of the young star than is traditionally thought.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.