Paper detail

Early optical emission in support of synchrotron radiation in $γ$-ray bursts

The origin of prompt emission in $γ$-ray bursts (GRBs) is highly debated topic. The observed spectra are supposed to play a crucial role in constraining the location of the emitting region, the strength of the magnetic field and the distribution of the accelerated particles. The apparent inconsistency of the prompt emission spectra with the synchrotron radiation scenario has resulted in considering more complex models. The inclusion of the soft X-ray data (down to 0.5 keV) in GRB spectra have led to the discovery of low-energy breaks in their spectra. More importantly, the distribution of spectral slopes has been shifted towards the prediction of the synchrotron radiation scenario if the break is associated with the synchrotron cooling frequency. We discuss the recent study that systematically extend the range of investigation down to the optical domain. It was shown that the optical-to-gamma-rays spectra are consistent with the synchrotron model. In addition, widely used empirical model made of thermal and non-thermal components has been tested. We conclude that most of the spectra are consistent with the synchrotron scenario while the two-component model faces difficulties to account for the optical radiation in presence/absence of the contaminating afterglow emission. We comment on the parameter space of GRB emitting region derived from the best fit parameters of the synchrotron model. In a basic one-shot particle acceleration model it corresponds to the quite contrived solutions for the magnetic field strength ($\sim$ 10 G) and for the radius of the emitting region ($R_γ\ge 10^{16}$ cm). Possible modifications of the basic model would be necessary to have a fully consistent picture.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.