Paper detail

Early inflation induced gravity waves can restrict Astro-Particle physics

In this paper, we discuss limits on various astro-particle scenarios if the scale \textit{and} the reheat temperature of the last relevant inflation were very high. While the observed "B" like pattern of polarizations of the CMB suggest a very high ($\ge 10^{16}\ GeV$) scale of a primordial (which motivated this work initially) and may reflect effects of dust, we believe that addressing these issues is nonetheless very useful. We recall the potential difficulties with various topological defects - monopoles, strings and domain walls generated at the SSB (spontaneous symmetry breaking) of various gauge symmetries. The main part of the paper is devoted to discussing difficulties with long-lived heavy particles, which could be dark matter but cannot efficiently annihilate to the required residual density because of basic S-Matrix unitarity/analyticity limits. We indicate in simple terms yet in some detail how the WIMP miracle occurs at $M(X)\sim{TeV}$ and how the axiomatic upper bound presently updated to $M(X) \le{110 TeV}$ was originally derived by Greist and Kamionokowski. We also argue that generically we expect the stronger $M(X)\le{20\ GeV}$ bound to hold. We then elaborate on the pure particle physics approaches aiming to enhance the annihilation and evade the bounds. We find that the only and in fact very satisfactory way of doing this requires endowing the particles with gauge interactions with a confinement scale lower than $M(X)$. We also comment on models with light $O(KeV)$ dark matter, which was supposed to be frozen in via out-of equilibrium processes so as to have the right relic densities pointing out that in many such cases \textit{very} low reheat temperatures are indeed required and speculate on the large desert scenario of particle physics. Most of what we discuss is not new but was not presented in a coherent fashion.

preprint2014arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.