Paper detail

Early Dynamical Instabilities in the Giant Planet Systems

The observed wide eccentricity distribution of extrasolar giant planets is thought to be the result of dynamical instabilities and gravitational scattering among planets. Previously, it has been assumed that the orbits in giant planet systems become gravitationally unstable after the gas nebula dispersal. It was not well understood, however, how these unstable conditions were established in the first place. In this work we numerically simulate the evolution of systems of three planets as the planets sequentially grow to Jupiter's mass, and dynamically interact among themselves and with the gas disk. We use the hydro-dynamical code FARGO that we modified by implementing the $N$-body integrator SyMBA. The new code can handle close encounters and collisions between planets. To test their stability, the planetary systems were followed with SyMBA for up to $10^8$ yr after the gas disk dispersal. We find that dynamics of the growing planets is complex, because migration and resonances raise their orbital eccentricities, and cause dynamical instabilities when gas is still around. If the dynamical instabilities occur early, planets can be removed by collisions and ejections, and the system rearranges into a new, more stable configuration. In this case, the planetary systems emerging from the gas disks are expected to be stable, and would need to be destabilized by other means (low-mass planets, planetesimal disks, etc.). Alternatively, for the giant planet system to be intrinsically unstable upon the gas disk dispersal, a special timing would be required with the growth of (at least some of) the giant planets having to occur near the end of the gas disk lifetime.

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.