Paper detail

Early detection of knee osteoarthritis using deep learning on knee magnetic resonance images

The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of MRI and patient data on the prediction of knee osteoarthritis (OA) incidence using different deep learning architectures. Knee OA incidence within 24 months was predicted using the intermediate-weighted turbo spin-echo (IW-TSE) sequence of 593 patients from the Osteoarthritis Initiative. To extract a region of interest containing the knee joint from the IW-TSE sequence, a U-Net model was trained and used to segment bone on a dual echo steady state (DESS) sequence. Subsequently, IW-TSE and DESS sequences were registered and the DESS segmentations were transformed to the corresponding IW-TSE scans. The performance of MRI-based features in the prediction of knee OA incidence was tested using three different deep learning architectures: a residual network (ResNet), a densely connected convolutional network (DenseNet), and a convolutional variational autoencoder (CVAE). To evaluate the predictive performance of MRI-based features alone, the outputs of ResNet, DenseNet, and CVAE were coupled with patient data (i.e., age, gender, BMI) and used as input to a Logistic Regression (LR) Classifier. Knee OA was defined based on visual MRI and X-ray-based OA features. The ResNet and DenseNet showed similar results, with both methods having the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) values up to 0.6269. The best performing OA detection model was CVAE with an AUC of 0.6699 when combined with patient data and an AUC of 0.6689 when used alone as input to the LR classifier. The results showed that three deep learning algorithms have similar metrics when using IW-TSE MRIs and their performance increased with the inclusion of patient data, which shows the strong influence of variables such as age, gender, and BMI on the detection of knee OA.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.