Paper detail

EAGT: Echocardiography Augmentation for Generalisability and Transferability

Deep learning models for echocardiography segmentation often struggle to generalise across institutions, scanners, and patient populations, where collecting large, consistently annotated datasets is infeasible. Data augmentation is widely used to improve the robustness of deep learning models; however, its role in enhancing cross-dataset generalisability in echocardiography remains insufficiently understood. This study presents a large-scale multi-dataset evaluation of 29 data augmentation techniques and their pairwise combinations for 2D left ventricular segmentation using a U-Net trained on Unity, CAMUS, and EchoNet Dynamic datasets. Each augmentation was explored under several hyperparameter settings and assessed through repeated runs using Dice and IoU in both in-domain and cross-dataset scenarios, with statistical significance quantified via independent t-tests. Results show that anatomically plausible geometric transformations, particularly affine, shift-scale-rotate, perspective, and random horizontal flip, substantially improve cross-dataset performance, whereas aggressive intensity- or artefact-based augmentations often degrade generalisability. Pairwise augmentation combinations outperform individual augmentations and show that moderate flip-centric combinations, especially random horizontal flip with affine, yield consistent gains across most transfer scenarios. These findings provide empirically grounded guidance for designing augmentation policies that enhance the robustness and transferability of echocardiography segmentation models.

preprint2026arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.