DYNAMO-HST Survey: Clumps in Nearby Massive Turbulent Disks and the Effects of Clump Clustering on Kiloparsec Scale Measurements of Clumps

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Abstract

We present ∼\sim100 pc resolution Hubble Space Telescope Hαα images of 10 galaxies from the DYnamics of Newly-Assembled Massive Objects (DYNAMO) survey of low-zz turbulent disk galaxies, and use these to undertake the first detailed systematic study of the effects of resolution and clump clustering on observations of clumps in turbulent disks. In the DYNAMO-{\em HST} sample we measure clump diameters spanning the range dclump∼100−800d_{clump} \sim 100-800~pc, and individual clump star formation rates as high as ∼5\sim5~M⊙_{\odot}~yr−1^{-1}. DYNAMO clumps have very high SFR surface densities, ΣSFR∼15Σ_{SFR}\sim 15~M⊙_{\odot}~yr−1^{-1}~kpc−2^{-2}, ∼100×\sim100\times higher than in H{\sc ii} regions of nearby spirals. Indeed, SFR surface density provides a simple dividing line between massive star forming clumps and local star forming regions, where massive star forming clumps have ΣSFR>0.5Σ_{SFR}> 0.5~M⊙_{\odot}~yr−1^{-1}~kpc−2^{-2}. When degraded to match the observations of galaxies in z∼1−3z\sim 1-3 surveys, DYNAMO galaxies are similar in morphology and measured clump properties to clumpy galaxies observed in the high-zz Universe. Emission peaks in the simulated high-redshift maps typically correspond to multiple clumps in full resolution images. This clustering of clumps systematically increases the apparent size and SFR of clumps in 1~kpc resolution maps, and decreases the measured SFR surface density of clumps by as much as a factor of 20×\times. From these results we can infer that clump clustering is likely to strongly effect the measured properties of clumps in high-zz galaxies, which commonly have kiloparsec scale resolution.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.