Paper detail

Dynamics of the anisotropic conformal Horava theory versus its kinetic-conformal formulation

We contrast the dynamics of the Horava theory with anisotropic Weyl symmetry with the case when this symmetry is explicitly broken, which is called the kinetic-conformal Horava theory. To do so we perform the canonical formulation of the anisotropic conformal theory at the classical level with a general conformal potential. Both theories have the generator of the anisotropic Weyl transformations as a constraint but it changes from first to second-class when the Weyl symmetry is broken. The FDiff-covariant vector a_i = \partial_i \ln N plays the role of gauge connection for the anisotropic Weyl transformations. A Lagrange multiplier plays also the role of gauge connection, being the time component. The anisotropic conformal theory propagates the same number of degrees of freedom of the kinetic-conformal theory, which in turn are the same of General Relativity. This is due to exchange of a second-class constraint in the kinetic-conformal case by a gauge symmetry in the anisotropic conformal case. An exception occurs if the conformal potential does not depend on the lapse function N, as is the case of the so called Cotton^2 potential, in which case one of the physical modes becomes odd. We develop in detail two explicit anisotropic conformal models. One of them depends on N whereas the other one is the Cotton^2 model. We also study conformally flat solutions in the anisotropic conformal and the kinetic-conformal theories, defining as conformally flat the spatial metric, but leaving for N a form different to the one dictated by the anisotropic Weyl transformations. We find that in both theories these configurations have vanishing canonical momentum and they are critical points of the potential. In the kinetic-conformal theory we find explicitly an exact, nontrivial, conformally flat solution.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors4 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.