Paper detail

Dynamics of Order Parameters near Stationary States in Superconductors with a Charge-Density Wave

We consider a simple model of a quasi-one-dimensional conductor in which two order parameters (OP) may coexist, i.e., the superconducting OP $Δ$ and the OP $W$ that characterizes the amplitude of a charge-density wave (CDW). In the mean field approximation we present equations for the matrix Green's functions $G_{ik}$, where $i$ relates to the one of the two Fermi sheets and $k$, operates in the Gor'kov-Nambu space. Using the solutions of these equations, we find stationary states for different values of the parameter describing the curvature of the Fermi surface, $μ$, which can be varied, e.g., by doping. It is established that in the interval $μ_1<μ<μ_2$ the self-consistency equations have a solution for coexisting OPs $Δ$ and $W$. However, this solution corresponds to a saddle point in the energy functional $Φ(Δ, W)$, i.e., it is unstable. Stable states are: 1)the state with the CDW at $μ< μ_{2}$; and 2) the purely superconducting state at $μ_1<μ$. At $μ<μ_0$, the state 1) corresponds to a global minimum, and at $μ_0<μ$, the state 2) has a lower energy, i.e., only the superconducting state survives at large $μ$. We study the dynamics of the variations $δΔ$ and $δW$ from these states in the collisionless limit. It is characterized by two modes of oscillations, the fast and the slow one. The fast mode is analogous to damped oscillations in conventional superconductors. The frequency of slow modes depends on the curvature $μ$ and is much smaller than $2Δ$ if the coupling constants for superconductivity and CDW are close to each other. The considered model can be applied to high-$T_c$ superconductors where the parts of the Fermi surface near the `hot' spots may be regarded as the considered two Fermi sheets. We also discuss relation of the considered model to the simplest model for Fe-based pnictides.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.