Paper detail

Dynamics of Open-Source Software Developer's Commit Behavior: An Empirical Investigation of Subversion

Commit is an important operation of revision control for open-source software (OSS). Recent research has been pursued to explore the statistical laws of such an operation, but few of those papers conduct empirical investigations on commit interval (i.e., the waiting time between two consecutive commits). In this paper, we investigated software developer's collective and individual commit behavior in terms of the distribution of commit intervals, and found that 1) the data sets of project-level commit interval within both the lifecycle and each release of the projects analyzed roughly follow power-law distributions; and 2) lifecycle- and release-level collective commit interval on class files can also be best fitted with power laws. These findings reveal some general (collective) collaborative development patterns of OSS projects, e.g., most of the waiting times between two consecutive commits to a central repository are short, but only a few of them experience a long duration of waiting. Then, the implications of what we found for OSS research were outlined, which could provide an insight into understanding OSS development processes better based on software developers' historical commit behavior.

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.