Paper detail

Dynamics of large-scale solar-wind streams obtained by the double superposed epoch analysis. 4. Helium abundance

This work is a continuation of our previous articles (Yermolaev et al. in J. Geophys. Res. 120, 7094, 2015; Yermolaev et al. in Solar Phys. 292, 193, 2017; Yermolaev et al. in Solar Phys. 293, 91, 2018), which describe the average temporal profiles of interplanetary plasma and field parameters in large-scale solar-wind (SW) streams: corotating interaction regions (CIRs), interplanetary coronal mass ejections (ICMEs including both magnetic clouds (MCs) and ejecta), and sheaths as well as interplanetary shocks (ISs). In this work we analyze the average profile of helium abundance Nα/Np for interval of 1976-2016. Our results confirm main early obtained results: Nα/Np is higher in quasi-stationary fast streams than in slow ones; it slowly changes in compression regions CIRs and Sheaths from values in undisturbed solar wind to values in corresponding type of piston (HSS or ICME); in Ejecta it is closed to abundance in undisturbed streams and it is maximal in MCs. We obtained for first time that Nα/Np correlates with plasma β-parameter in compression regions CIRs and Sheaths and anti-correlates in ICMEs. The Nα/Np vs. β dependence is stronger in MCs than in Ejecta and may be used as an indicator of conditions in CME formation place on the Sun.

preprint2019arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.