Paper detail

Dynamics of interacting bosons using the Herman-Kluk semiclassical initial value representation

Recent experimental progress using ultracold gases in optical lattices necessitates a quantitative theoretical description for a significant number of bosons. In the present paper, we investigate if time-dependent semiclassical initial value methods, with propagators expressed as integrals over phase space using classical trajectories, is suitable to describe interacting bosons, concentrating on a single mode. Despite the nonlinear contribution from the self-interaction, the corresponding classical dynamics allows for a largely analytical treatment of the semiclassical propagator. We find that the Herman-Kluk (HK) propagator conserves unitarity in the semiclassical limit ($n\to\infty$), but a decay of the norm is seen for low $n$. The frozen Gaussian approximation (FGA, i.e. HK with unit prefactor) is explicitly shown to violate unitarity in the present system for non-vanishing interaction strength, even in the semiclassical limit. Furthermore, we show by evaluating the phase space integral in steepest descent approximation, that the HK propagator reproduces the exact spectrum correctly in the limit $n\to \infty$. An error is, however, incurred in next-to-next-to-leading order (small parameter $1/n$), as seen upon numerical evaluation of the integral or by considering finite $n$ corrections to steepest descent. The FGA, in contrast, is only accurate to lowest order, and an erroneous next-to-leading order term in the energy spectrum was found analytically. Finally, as an example application, we study the dynamics of wave packets by computing the time evolution of the Wigner function. While the often-used truncated Wigner approximation cannot capture any interferences present in the exact quantum mechanical solution (known analytically), we find that the HK approach, despite also using classical information only, reproduces the salient features of the exact solution correctly.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.