Paper detail

Dynamics of Evaporating Respiratory Droplets in the Vicinity of Vortex Dipoles

A new mathematical analysis of exhaled respiratory droplet dynamics and settling distances in the vicinity of vortical environments is presented. Recent experimental and theoretical studies suggest that vortical flow structures may enhance the settling distances of exhaled respiratory droplets beyond the two-meter distancing rule recommended by health authorities lately. We propose a mathematical framework to study the underlying physical mechanism responsible for the entrapment and subsequently delayed settling times of evaporating droplets and solid particles. A dipolar vortex is considered self-propelling through a cloud of micron-sized evaporating droplets. This configuration might be utilized to approximate an indoor environment in which similar unsteady vortical flow structures interact with exhaled respiratory droplets. We demonstrate the vortex dipole effect on droplet and solid particles settling distances, depending on the evaporation rate, the vorticity of the dipole, and the droplet's initial diameter and location relative to the vortex core. Our theoretical analysis reveals non-intuitive interactions between the vortex dipole, droplet relaxation time, gravity, and mass transfer. The existence of optimal conditions for maximum displacement is suggested, where the droplet entrainment reaches up to an order of magnitude larger than the vortex core length scale. We present a basic model that may be applied for evaluating the spread of exhaled respiratory droplets in vortical environments. Our theoretical study suggests that exhaled respiratory droplets initially at rest can translate to significant distances, hence implying that vortical flow might enhance the transmission of airborne pathogens.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.