Paper detail

Dynamics of a generalized Beverton-Holt competition model subject to Allee effects

We propose and study {a generalized Beverton-Holt competition model} subject to Allee effects to obtain insights on how the interplay of Allee effects and contest competition affects the persistence and the extinction of two competing species. By using {the theory of monotone dynamics} and the properties of critical curves for non-invertible maps, our analysis shows that our model has simple equilibrium dynamics for most conditions. The coexistence of two competing species occurs only if the system has four interior equilibria.} We provide an {approximation to} the basins of the boundary attractors (i.e., the extinction of one or both species) where our results suggests that {contest species are more prone to extinction than scramble ones are at low densities}. In addition, {in comparison to the} dynamics of two species scramble competition models subject to Allee effects, our study suggests that (i) Both contest and scramble competition models can have only three boundary attractors without the coexistence equilibria, or four attractors among which only one is the {persistent attractor}, {whereas} scramble competition {models} may have the extinction of both species as its only attractor under certain conditions, i.e., \emph{the essential extinction} of two species due to strong Allee effects; (ii) {Scramble competition models like Ricker type models can} have much more complicated dynamical structure of interior attractors than contest ones like Beverton-Holt type models have; and (iii) Scramble competition models {like Ricker type competition models} may be more likely to promote the coexistence of two species at low and high densities under certain conditions.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.