Paper detail

Dynamics and friction of a large colloidal particle in a bath of hard spheres: Langevin dynamics simulations and hydrodynamic description

The analysis of the dynamics of tracer particles in a complex bath can provide valuable information about the microscopic behaviour of the bath. In this work, we study the dynamics of a forced tracer in a colloidal bath by means of Langevin dynamics simulations and a theory model within continuum mechanics. In the simulations, the bath is comprised by quasi-hard spheres with a volume fraction of 50% immersed in a featureless quiescent solvent, and the tracer is pulled with a constant small force (within the linear regime). The theoretical analysis is based on the Navier Stokes equation, where a term proportional to the velocity arises from coarse-graining the friction of the colloidal particles with the solvent. As a result, the final equation is similar to the Brinkman model, although the interpretation is different. A length scale appears in the model, 1/k_0, where the transverse momentum transport crosses over to friction with the solvent. The effective friction coefficient experienced by the tracer grows with the tracer size faster than the prediction from Stokes law. Additionally, the velocity profiles in the bath decay faster than in a Newtonian fluid. The comparison between simulations and theory points to a boundary condition of effective partial slip at the tracer surface. We also study the fluctuations in the tracer position, showing that it reaches diffusion at long times, with a subdiffusive regime at intermediate times. The diffusion coefficient, obtained from the long-time slope of the mean squared displacement, fulfills the Stokes-Einstein relation with the friction coefficient calculated from the steady tracer velocity, confirming the validity of the linear response formalism.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.