Paper detail

Dynamically Modelling Heterogeneous Higher-Order Interactions for Malicious Behavior Detection in Event Logs

Anomaly detection in event logs is a promising approach for intrusion detection in enterprise networks. By building a statistical model of usual activity, it aims to detect multiple kinds of malicious behavior, including stealthy tactics, techniques and procedures (TTPs) designed to evade signature-based detection systems. However, finding suitable anomaly detection methods for event logs remains an important challenge. This results from the very complex, multi-faceted nature of the data: event logs are not only combinatorial, but also temporal and heterogeneous data, thus they fit poorly in most theoretical frameworks for anomaly detection. Most previous research focuses on either one of these three aspects, building a simplified representation of the data that can be fed to standard anomaly detection algorithms. In contrast, we propose to simultaneously address all three of these characteristics through a specifically tailored statistical model. We introduce \textsc{Decades}, a \underline{d}ynamic, h\underline{e}terogeneous and \underline{c}ombinatorial model for \underline{a}nomaly \underline{d}etection in \underline{e}vent \underline{s}treams, and we demonstrate its effectiveness at detecting malicious behavior through experiments on a real dataset containing labelled red team activity. In particular, we empirically highlight the importance of handling the multiple characteristics of the data by comparing our model with state-of-the-art baselines relying on various data representations.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.