Paper detail

Dynamical population synthesis: Constructing the stellar single and binary contents of galactic field populations

[abridged] The galactic field&#39;s late-type stellar single and binary population is calculated on the supposition that all stars form as binaries in embedded star clusters. A recently developed tool (Marks, Kroupa & Oh) is used to evolve the binary star distributions in star clusters for a few Myr so that a particular mixture of single and binary stars is achieved. On cluster dissolution the population enters the galactic field with these characteristics. The different contributions of single stars and binaries from individual star clusters which are selected from a power-law embedded star cluster mass function are then added up. This gives rise to integrated galactic field binary distribution functions (IGBDFs) resembling a galactic field&#39;s stellar content (Dynamical Population Synthesis). It is found that the binary proportion in the galactic field of a galaxy is larger the lower the minimum cluster mass, the lower the star formation rate, the steeper the embedded star cluster mass function and the larger the typical size of forming star clusters in the considered galaxy. In particular, period-, mass-ratio- and eccentricity IGBDFs for the Milky Way are modelled. The afore mentioned theoretical IGBDFs agree with independently observed distributions. Of all late-type binaries, 50% stem from M<300M_sun clusters, while 50% of all single stars were born in M>10^4M_sun clusters. Comparison of the G-dwarf and M-dwarf binary population indicates that the stars formed in mass-segregated clusters. In particular it is pointed out that although in the present model all M-dwarfs are born in binary systems, in the Milky Way&#39;s Galactic field the majority ends up being single stars. This work predicts that today&#39;s binary frequency in elliptical galaxies is lower than in spiral and in dwarf-galaxies. The period and mass-ratio distributions in these galaxies are explicitly predicted.

preprint2011arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.