Paper detail

Dynamical Masses and Stellar Evolutionary Model Predictions of M-Stars

In this era of Gaia and ALMA, dynamical stellar mass measurements provide benchmarks that are independent of observations of stellar characteristics and their uncertainties. These benchmarks can then be used to validate and improve stellar evolutionary models, which can lead to both imprecise and inaccurate mass predictions for pre-main-sequence, low-mass stars. We present the dynamical stellar masses derived from disks around three M-stars (FP Tau, J0432+1827, and J1100-7619) using ALMA observations of $^{12}$CO (J=2--1) and $^{13}$CO (J=2--1) emission. These are the first dynamical stellar mass measurements for J0432+1827 and J1100-7619 and the most precise measurement for FP Tau. Fiducial stellar evolutionary model tracks, which do not include any treatment of magnetic activity, agree with the dynamical measurement of J0432+1827 but underpredict the mass by $\sim$60\% for FP Tau and $\sim$80\% for J1100-7619. Possible explanations for the underpredictions include inaccurate assumptions of stellar effective temperature, undetected binarity for J1100-7619, and that fiducial stellar evolutionary models are not complex enough to represent these stars. In the former case, the stellar effective temperatures would need to be increased by $\sim$40K to $\sim$340K to reconcile the fiducial model predictions with the dynamically-measured masses. In the latter case, we show that the dynamical masses can be reproduced using results from stellar evolutionary models with starspots, which incorporate fractional starspot coverage to represent the manifestation of magnetic activity. Folding in low-mass M-stars from the literature and assuming that the stellar effective temperatures are imprecise but accurate, we find tentative evidence of a relationship between fractional starspot coverage and observed effective temperature for these young, cool stars.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.