Paper detail

Dynamical Majorana Neutrino Masses and Axions II: Inclusion of Axial Background and Anomaly Terms

We extend the study of a previous publication \cite{amsot} on Schwinger-Dyson dynamical mass generation for fermions and pseudoscalar fields (axion-like particles (ALP)), in field theories containing Yukawa type interactions between the fermions and ALPs, by incorporating anomaly terms and/or (constant) axial background fields. The latter are linked to some Lorentz (and CPT) violating scenarios for leptogenesis in the early Universe. We discuss both Hermitian and non-Hermitian Yukawa interactions, anomaly terms and axial backgrounds, which are all motivated in the context of some scenarios for radiative (anomalous) Majorana sterile neutrino masses in string-isnpired, low-energy, effective field theories, including attractive four-fermion interactions. We show that, for a Hermitian Yukawa interaction, there is no (pseudo)scalar dynamical mass generation, but there is fermion dynamical mass generation, provided one adds a bare (pseudo)scalar mass. For this case, the hermitian anomaly terms play a similar role in inducing dynamical mass generation for fermions as the four-fermion attractive interactions. For antihermitian Yukawa interactions, an antihermitian anomaly resists mass generation. The axial background terms assist dynamical mass generation induced by antihermitian Yukawa interactions, in the sense that the larger the magnitude of the background, the larger the dynamical mass. For hermitian Yukawa interactions, however, the situation is the opposite, in the sense that the larger the background the smaller the dynamical mass. We also compare the anomaly-induced dynamical mass with the radiative fermion mass in models of sterile neutrinos, and find that in cases where the dynamical mass occurs, the latter dominates over the anomalously generated radiative sterile-neutrino mass.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.