Paper detail

Dynamical formation of the GW190814 merger

We investigate the possible dynamical origin of GW190814, a gravitational wave (GW) source discovered by the LIGO-Virgo-Kagra collaboration (LVC) associated with a merger between a stellar black hole (BH) with mass $23.2$ M$_\odot$ and a compact object, either a BH or a neutron star (NS), with mass $2.59$ M$_\odot$. Using a database of 240,000 $N$-body simulations modelling the formation of NS-BH mergers via dynamical encounters in dense clusters, we find that systems like GW190814 are likely to form in young, metal-rich clusters. Our model suggests that a little excess ($\sim 2-4\%$) of objects with masses in the range $2.3-3$ M$_\odot$ in the compact remnants mass spectrum leads to a detection rate for dynamically formed "GW190814 -like" mergers of $Γ_{\rm GW190814} \simeq 1-6$ yr Gpc$^{-3}$, i.e. within the observational constraints set by the GW190814 discovery, $Γ_{\rm LVC} \sim 1-23$ yr Gpc$^{-3}$. Additionally, our model suggests that $\sim 1.8-4.8\%$ of dynamical NS-BH mergers are compatible with GW190426\_152155, the only confirmed NS-BH merger detected by the LVC. We show that the relative amount of light and heavy NS-BH mergers can provide clues about the environments in which they developed.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.