Paper detail

Dynamical evolution of black hole sub-systems in idealised star clusters

In this paper, globular star clusters which contain a sub-system of stellar-mass black holes (BH) are investigated. This is done by considering two-component models, as these are the simplest approximation of more realistic multi-mass systems, where one component represents the BH population and the other represents all the other stars. These systems are found to undergo a long phase of evolution where the centre of the system is dominated by a dense BH sub-system. After mass segregation has driven most of the BH into a compact sub-system, the evolution of the BH sub-system is found to be influenced by the cluster in which it is contained. The BH sub-system evolves in such a way as to satisfy the energy demands of the whole cluster, just as the core of a one component system must satisfy the energy demands of the whole cluster. The BH sub-system is found to exist for a significant amount of time. It takes approximately 10t_{rh,i}, where t_{rh,i} is the initial half-mass relaxation time, from the formation of the compact BH sub-system up until the time when 90% of the sub-system total mass is lost (which is of order 10^{3} times the half-mass relaxation time of the BH sub-system at its time of formation). Based on theoretical arguments the rate of mass loss from the BH sub-system (\dot{M}_2) is predicted to be -(beta*zeta*M)/(alpha*t_{rh}), where M is the total mass, t_{rh} is the half-mass relaxation time, and alpha, beta, zeta are three dimensionless parameters (see Section 2 for details). An interesting consequence of this is that the rate of mass loss from the BH sub-system is approximately independent of the stellar mass ratio (m_2/m_1) and the total mass ratio (M_2/M_1) (in the range m_2/m_1 >~ 10 and M_2/M_1 ~ 10^{-2}, where m_1, m_2 are the masses of individual low-mass and high-mass particles respectively, and M_1, M_2 are the corresponding total masses).

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.