Paper detail

Dynamical evolution of a magnetic cloud from the Sun to 5.4 AU

Magnetic Clouds (MCs) are a particular subset of Interplanetary Coronal Mass Ejections (ICMEs), forming large scale magnetic flux ropes. In this work we analyze the evolution of a particular MC (observed on March 1998) using {\it in situ} observations made by two spacecraft approximately aligned with the Sun, the first one at 1 AU from the Sun and the second one at 5.4 AU. We study the MC expansion, its consequent decrease of magnetic field intensity and mass density, and the possible evolution of the so-called global ideal-MHD nvariants. We describe the magnetic configuration of the MC at both spacecraft using different models and compute relevant global quantities (magnetic fluxes, helicity and energy) at both helio-distances. We also track back this structure to the Sun, in order to find out its solar source. We find that the flux rope is significantly distorted at 5.4 AU. However, we are able to analyze the data before the flux rope center is over-passed and compare it with observations at 1 AU. From the observed decay of magnetic field and mass density, we quantify how anisotropic is the expansion, and the consequent deformation of the flux rope in favor of a cross section with an aspect ratio at 5.4 AU of $\approx 1.6$ (larger in the direction perpendicular to the radial direction from the Sun). We quantify the ideal-MHD invariants and magnetic energy at both locations, and find that invariants are almost conserved, while the magnetic energy decays as expected with the expansion rate found. The use of MHD invariants to link structures at the Sun and the interplanetary medium is supported by the results of this multispacecraft study. We also conclude that the local dimensionless expansion rate, that is computed from the velocity profile observed by a single spacecraft, is very accurate for predicting the evolution of flux ropes in the solar wind.

preprint2011arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.