Abstract

We compare the observed turbulent pressure in molecular gas, PturbP_\mathrm{turb}, to the required pressure for the interstellar gas to stay in equilibrium in the gravitational potential of a galaxy, PDEP_\mathrm{DE}. To do this, we combine arcsecond resolution CO data from PHANGS-ALMA with multi-wavelength data that traces the atomic gas, stellar structure, and star formation rate (SFR) for 28 nearby star-forming galaxies. We find that PturbP_\mathrm{turb} correlates with, but almost always exceeds the estimated PDEP_\mathrm{DE} on kiloparsec scales. This indicates that the molecular gas is over-pressurized relative to the large-scale environment. We show that this over-pressurization can be explained by the clumpy nature of molecular gas; a revised estimate of PDEP_\mathrm{DE} on cloud scales, which accounts for molecular gas self-gravity, external gravity, and ambient pressure, agrees well with the observed PturbP_\mathrm{turb} in galaxy disks. We also find that molecular gas with cloud-scale Pturb≈PDE≳105 kB K cm−3{P_\mathrm{turb}}\approx{P_\mathrm{DE}}\gtrsim{10^5\,k_\mathrm{B}\,\mathrm{K\,cm^{-3}}} in our sample is more likely to be self-gravitating, whereas gas at lower pressure appears more influenced by ambient pressure and/or external gravity. Furthermore, we show that the ratio between PturbP_\mathrm{turb} and the observed SFR surface density, ΣSFRΣ_\mathrm{SFR}, is compatible with stellar feedback-driven momentum injection in most cases, while a subset of the regions may show evidence of turbulence driven by additional sources. The correlation between ΣSFRΣ_\mathrm{SFR} and kpc-scale PDEP_\mathrm{DE} in galaxy disks is consistent with the expectation from self-regulated star formation models. Finally, we confirm the empirical correlation between molecular-to-atomic gas ratio and kpc-scale PDEP_\mathrm{DE} reported in previous works.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.