Paper detail

Dynamical difference between the cD galaxy and the stellar diffuse component in simulated galaxy clusters

Member galaxies within galaxy clusters nowadays can be routinely identified in cosmological, hydrodynamical simulations using methods based on identifying self bound, locally over dense substructures. However, distinguishing the central galaxy from the stellar diffuse component within clusters is notoriously difficult, and in the center it is not even clear if two distinct stellar populations exist. Here, after subtracting all member galaxies, we use the velocity distribution of the remaining stars and detect two dynamically, well-distinct stellar components within simulated galaxy clusters. These differences in the dynamics can be used to apply an un-binding procedure which leads to a spatial separation of the two components into a cD and a diffuse stellar component (DSC). Applying our new algorithm to a cosmological, hydrodynamical simulation we find that -- in line with previous studies -- these two components have clearly distinguished spatial and velocity distributions as well as different star formation histories. We show that the DSC fraction -- which can broadly be associated with the observed intra cluster light -- does not depend on the virial mass of the galaxy cluster and is much more sensitive to the formation history of the cluster. We conclude that the separation of the cD and the DSC in simulations, based on our dynamical criteria, is more physically motivated than current methods which depend on implicit assumptions on a length scale associated with the cD galaxy and therefore represent a step forward in understanding the different stellar components within galaxy clusters. Our results also show the importance of analyzing the dynamics of the DSC to characterize its properties and understand its origin.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.