Paper detail

Dynamical Analysis of the 3:1 Resonance in the upsilon-Andromedae System

We study the dynamics of the upsilon-Andromedae planetary system proposed by Curiel et al. (2011). We focus on the study of the 3:1 Mean Motion Resonance between upsilon-Andromedae-d and the recently discovered upsilon-Andromedae-e (hereafter upsilon-And-d and upsilon-And-e). Numerical simulations of the dynamics of the four planet system are conducted. The previously reported apsidal resonance between upsilon-And-c and upsilon-And-d is confirmed. In addition, we find that upsilon-And-d and upsilon-And-e are also in an apsidal resonance condition. Our results further indicate that the upsilon-Andromedae planetary system configuration is in the middle of a stability island in the semimajor axis-eccentricity domain. Additionally, we performed numerical integrations of the planetary configuration over 500 Myr and found it to be stable. We conclude that, within the uncertainties in the value of the orbital parameters, it is likely that upsilon-Andromedae planetary system will remain stable for a long timescale.

preprint2011arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.