Paper detail

Dynamic read mapping and online consensus calling for better variant detection

Variant detection from high-throughput sequencing data is an essential step in identification of alleles involved in complex diseases and cancer. To deal with these massive data, elaborated sequence analysis pipelines are employed. A core component of such pipelines is a read mapping module whose accuracy strongly affects the quality of resulting variant calls. We propose a dynamic read mapping approach that significantly improves read alignment accuracy. The general idea of dynamic mapping is to continuously update the reference sequence on the basis of previously computed read alignments. Even though this concept already appeared in the literature, we believe that our work provides the first comprehensive analysis of this approach. To evaluate the benefit of dynamic mapping, we developed a software pipeline (http://github.com/karel-brinda/dymas) that mimics different dynamic mapping scenarios. The pipeline was applied to compare dynamic mapping with the conventional static mapping and, on the other hand, with the so-called iterative referencing - a computationally expensive procedure computing an optimal modification of the reference that maximizes the overall quality of all alignments. We conclude that in all alternatives, dynamic mapping results in a much better accuracy than static mapping, approaching the accuracy of iterative referencing. To correct the reference sequence in the course of dynamic mapping, we developed an online consensus caller named OCOCO (http://github.com/karel-brinda/ococo). OCOCO is the first consensus caller capable to process input reads in the online fashion. Finally, we provide conclusions about the feasibility of dynamic mapping and discuss main obstacles that have to be overcome to implement it. We also review a wide range of possible applications of dynamic mapping with a special emphasis on variant detection.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.