Paper detail

Dynamic phenotypes as criteria for model discrimination: fold-change detection in R. sphaeroides

The chemotaxis pathway of the bacterium Rhodobacter sphaeroides has many similarities to the well-studied pathway in Escherichia coli. It exhibits robust adaptation and has several homologues of the latter's chemotaxis proteins. Recent theoretical results have been able to correctly predict that the chemotactic response of Escherichia coli exhibits the same output behavior in response to scaled ligand inputs, a dynamic property known as fold-change detection (FCD), or input-scale invariance. In this paper, we present theoretical assumptions on the R. sphaeroides chemotaxis sensing dynamics that can be analytically shown to yield FCD behavior in a specific ligand concentration range. Based on these assumptions, we construct two models of the full chemotaxis pathway that are able to reproduce experimental time-series data from earlier studies. To test the validity of our assumptions, we propose a series of experiments in which our models predict robust FCD behavior where earlier models do not. In this way, we illustrate how a dynamic phenotype such as FCD can be used for the purposes of discriminating between two models that reproduce the same experimental time-series data.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.