Dynamic monopolies in directed graphs: the spread of unilateral influence in social networks

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Abstract

Let GG be a directed graph such that the in-degree of any vertex GG is at least one. Let also τ:V(G)→N{\mathcalτ}: V(G)\rightarrow \Bbb{N} be an assignment of thresholds to the vertices of GG. A subset MM of vertices of GG is called a dynamic monopoly for (G,τ)(G,τ) if the vertex set of GG can be partitioned into D0∪...∪DtD_0\cup... \cup D_t such that D0=MD_0=M and for any i≥1i\geq 1 and any v∈Div\in D_i, the number of edges from D0∪...∪Di−1D_0\cup... \cup D_{i-1} to vv is at least τ(v)τ(v). One of the most applicable and widely studied threshold assignments in directed graphs is strict majority threshold assignment in which for any vertex vv, τ(v)=⌈(degin(v)+1)/2⌉τ(v)=\lceil (deg^{in}(v)+1)/2 \rceil, where degin(v)deg^{in}(v) stands for the in-degree of vv. By a strict majority dynamic monopoly of a graph GG we mean any dynamic monopoly of GG with strict majority threshold assignment for the vertices of GG. In this paper we first discuss some basic upper and lower bounds for the size of dynamic monopolies with general threshold assignments and then obtain some hardness complexity results concerning the smallest size of dynamic monopolies in directed graphs. Next we show that any directed graph on nn vertices and with positive minimum in-degree admits a strict majority dynamic monopoly with n/2n/2 vertices. We show that this bound is achieved by a polynomial time algorithm. This upper bound improves greatly the best known result. The final note of the paper deals with the possibility of the improvement of the latter n/2n/2 bound.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.