Paper detail

Dynamic and Thermodynamic Stability of Relativistic, Perfect Fluid Stars

We consider perfect fluid bodies (stars) in general relativity, characterized by particle number density and entropy per particle. A star is said to be in dynamic equilibrium if it is a stationary, axisymmetric solution to the Einstein-fluid equations with circular flow. We prove that for a star in dynamic equilibrium, the necessary and sufficient condition for thermodynamic equilibrium (extremum of total entropy S) is constancy of angular velocity (Ω), redshifted temperature, and redshifted chemical potential. Friedman previously identified positivity of canonical energy, E, as a criterion for dynamic stability and argued that all rotating stars are dynamically unstable to sufficiently nonaxisymmetric perturbations (the CFS instability), so our main focus is on axisymmetric stability. We show that for a star in dynamic equilibrium, mode stability holds with respect to all axisymmetric perturbations if E is positive on a certain subspace, V, of axisymmetric Lagrangian perturbations that, in particular, have no Lagrangian change in angular momentum density. Conversely, if E fails to be positive on V, then there exist perturbations that can't become asymptotically stationary at late times. We further show that for a star in thermodynamic equilibrium, the canonical energy in the rotating frame, E_r, is related to second order changes in ADM mass, M, and angular momentum, J, by E_r = δ^2 M - Ωδ^2 J. Thus, positivity of E_r for perturbations with δJ = 0 is a necessary condition for thermodynamic stability (local maximum of S). For axisymmetric perturbations we have E = E_r, so a necessary condition for thermodynamic stability with respect to axisymmetric perturbations is positivity of E on all perturbations with δJ = 0, not merely on the perturbations in V. Many of our results are in close parallel to results of Hollands and Wald for the theory of black holes.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.