Paper detail

Dwarfs after Mergers? The case of NGC520, NGC772, Arp141, NGC3226/7, NGC3656 and Arp299

We present results from a survey of dwarf galaxy candidates in the vicinity of strongly interacting galaxies. The goal of the survey was a test of the hypothesis that massive condensations of stars and HI in tidal tails of large interacting galaxies may be a significant source of independent, self-gravitating dwarf galaxies. These so called tidal dwarf galaxies (TDG) can be expected to resemble the blue luminous knots found in tidal tails, but also might appear as redder, evolved systems if formed much before they are being observed. For the present study, a homogeneous subsample of 6 fields was selected from the catalog of extended objects in fields around 15 strongly interacting galaxies by Deeg et al. (1998). Criteria for the subsample were: similar redshifts of the central interacting galaxies, and photometric completeness of the extended objects in V and R. The number density of these TDG candidates was compared with expected background galaxy densities. Within the statistical errors, background galaxies account for most, if not all of the extended objects. There is no evidence for a substantial locally formed dwarf galaxy population. Thus, we conclude that field galaxy-galaxy interactions are likely to result in the formation of only a few long-lived TDG.

preprint2003arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.