Paper detail

Dutch Books and Combinatorial Games

The theory of combinatorial game (like board games) and the theory of social games (where one looks for Nash equilibria) are normally considered as two separate theories. Here we shall see what comes out of combining the ideas. The central idea is Conway's observation that real numbers can be interpreted as special types of combinatorial games. Therefore the payoff function of a social game is a combinatorial game. Probability theory should be considered as a safety net that prevents inconsistent decisions via the Dutch Book Argument. This result can be extended to situations where the payoff function is a more general game than a real number. The main difference between number valued payoff and game valued payoff is that a probability distribution that gives non-negative mean payoff does not ensure that the game will be lost due to the existence of infinitisimal games. Also the Ramsay/de Finetti theorem on exchangable sequences is discussed.

preprint2010arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.